Measurement of Epidermis, Dermis, and Total Skin Thicknesses from Six Different Body Regions with a new Ethical Histometric Technique

Pembe Oltulu, Bilsev İnce, Naile Kökbudak, sıdıka Fındık, Fahriye Kılıç

Özet


Introduction: Although it is important to know the normal values of dermis, epidermis, or total skin thicknesses (ST) for some drugs and
vaccine research, skin‑related clinical investigations, and skin transfer operations used in plastic surgery, it would not be ethical to take new
biopsies from healthy volunteers to measure their ST. This study aims to describe a new ethical histometric technique for the measurement
of skin layers and to determine the mean ST of some major body regions in the people living in our region. Materials and Methods: A total
of 180 skin samples from six major body regions of 90 males and 90 females were enrolled in the study. The measurements were performed
histometrically from appropriate skin samples obtained from the pathology archive. The samples were classified according to the six different
parts of the body (scalp, abdomen, back, dorsum of foot, dorsum of hand, and the breast). Results: The mean epidermal thickness ranged from
76.9 ± 26.2 to 267.4 ± 120.6 μm. The thickest epidermis was found in the dorsum of foot in women (267.4 ± 120.6 μm) while the thinnest was
found in the breast in women (76.9 ± 26.2 μm). The mean dermal thickness ranged from 2115 ± 946.4 to 5888 ± 2422.3 μm. The thickest dermis
was found in the breast in men (5888 ± 2422.3 μm), while the thinnest dermis was found in the dorsum of hand in women (2115 ± 946.4 μm).
Conclusions: Human ST varies according to ethnic origin. It was determined that the dermis and epidermis of Anatolian people are thicker
than that of the previously reported other ethnic groups. The skin pathology archive can be used to create maps of the body’s skin structure.
Keywords: Dermis, epidermis, histometric, skin thickness

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


References

Elder DE. Lever’s Histopathology of the Skin. 10 th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: By Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer, business; 2009:8-61

Lee Y, Hwang K. Skin thickness of Korean adults. Surg Radiol Anat. 2002;24(3-4):183-189.

Hoffmann K, Stucker M, Dirschka T, Goörtz S, El-Gammal S, Dirting K, et al. Twenty MHz B-scan sonography for visualization and skin thickness measurement of human skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1994;3:302–313.

Seidenari S, Pagnomi A, Di Nardo A, Giannetti A. Echographic evaluation with image analysis of normal skin: variations according to age and sex. Skin Pharmacol 1994;7:201–209.

Sandby-Møller J, Poulsen T, Wulf HC. Epidermal Thickness at Different Body Sites: Relationship to Age, Gender, Pigmentation, Blood Content, Skin Type and Smoking habits. Acta Derm Venereol 2003;83(6):410-413.

Dao H, Kazin RA. Gender differences in skin: a review of the literature. Gender medicine 2007;4(4):308-328.

Shuster S, Black MM, McVitie E. The influence of age and sex on skin thickness, skin collagen and density. Br J Dermatol 1975;93(6):639-43.

Southwood WFW. The thickness of the skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1955;15: 423–429 9. Chopra K, Calva D, Sosin M, Tadisina KK, Banda A, De La Cruz C, et al. A comprehensive examination of topographic thickness of skin in the human face. Aesthet Surg J 2015;35(8):1007-1013

Anand SS, Gupta MK, Schulze KM, Desai D, Abdalla N, Wahi G, et al. What accounts for ethnic differences in newborn skinfold thickness comparing South Asians and White Caucasians? Findings from the START and FAMILY Birth Cohorts. Int J Obes (Lond) 2016 ;40(2):239-244.

Libshitz HI, Montague ED, Paulus DD Jr. Skin thickness in the therapeutically irradiated breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978;130(2):345-347.

Ince B, Dadaci M, Oltulu P, Altuntas Z, Bilgen F. Effect of Dermal Thickness on Scars in Women with Type III-IV Fitzpatrick Skin. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015;39(3):318-324.

Laurent A, Mistretta F, Bottigioli D, Dahel K, Goujon C, Nicolas JF, et al. Echographic measurement of skin thickness in adults by high frequency ultrasound to assess the appropriate microneedle length for intradermal delivery of vaccines. Vaccine 2007;25(34):6423-6430.

Dykes PJ, Marks R. Measurement of skin thickness: a comparison of two in vivo techniques with a conventional histometric method. J Invest Dermatol 1977;69(3):275-278.

Alexander H, Miller DL J. Determining skin thickness with pulsed ultra sound. J Invest Dermatol 1979;72(1):17-19.

Rajadhyaksha M, González S, Zavislan JM, Anderson RR, Webb RH. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology. J Invest Dermatol 1999;113(3):293-303.

Pope TL Jr, Read ME, Medsker T, Buschi AJ, Brenbridge AN. Breast skin thickness: normal range and causes of thickening shown on film-screen mammography. J Can Assoc Radiol 1984;35(4):365-368.

Verim A, Duymus R, Calim OF, Karaca CT, Ozkul MH, Yasar H, et al. Effect of nose skin on the columellar incision scar in a Turkish population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;149:438–444.




Online ISSN:2528-8644
Basılı ISSN:1300-6878 (önceki)

Türk Plastik Rekonstrüktif ve Estetik Cerrahi Dergisi (Turk J Plast Surg),
Türk Plastik Rekonstrüktif ve Estetik Cerrahi Derneği'nin, Estetik Plastik Cerrahi Derneği'nin, Türkiye Interplast Derneği'nin ve Çene Yüz Cerrahları Derneği'nin yayın organıdır.